Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Didn't we used to be slightly better than Saddam?

IRAQ HAS POSSIBLY EMPLOYED PHOSPHOROUS CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST THE KURDISH POPULATION IN AREAS ALONG THE IRAQI-TURKISH-IRANIAN BORDERS. […]

IN LATE FEBRUARY 1991, FOLLOWING THE COALITION FORCES’ OVERWHELMING VICTORY OVER IRAQ, KURDISH REBELS STEPPED UP THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST IRAQI FORCES IN NORTHERN IRAQ. DURING THE BRUTAL CRACKDOWN THAT FOLLOWED THE KURDISH UPRISING, IRAQI FORCES LOYAL TO PRESIDENT SADDAM ((HUSSEIN)) MAY HAVE POSSIBLY USED WHITE PHOSPHOROUS (WP) CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST KURDISH REBELS AND THE POPULACE IN ERBIL (GEOCOORD:3412N/04401E) (VICINITY OF IRANIAN BORDER) AND DOHUK (GEOCOORD:3652N/04301E) (VICINITY OF IRAQI BORDER) PROVINCES, IRAQ.

In other words, the Pentagon does refer to white phosphorus rounds as chemical weapons — at least if they’re used by our enemies.


Via Think Progress

Rape rooms: Check

Secret Prisons: Check

Widespread torture and intimidation: Check

Chemical weapons used against civillian targets: Check

Rampant corruption: Check

At odds with Iran: Check

At odds with Syria: Check

If it weren't for the increased deaths and total anarchy, Iraqis probably wouldn't be able to tell that Saddam isn't in charge anymore. It seems that the only problem we ever had with the way Saddam ran Iraq was that his name was Saddam Hussein.

No comments: